Everyone Wants Crypto Regulations – On Their Terms

The industry is speaking, but lawmakers may not be listening.

AccessTimeIconOct 26, 2021 at 8:30 p.m. UTC
Updated May 11, 2023 at 6:28 p.m. UTC
AccessTimeIconOct 26, 2021 at 8:30 p.m. UTCUpdated May 11, 2023 at 6:28 p.m. UTC
AccessTimeIconOct 26, 2021 at 8:30 p.m. UTCUpdated May 11, 2023 at 6:28 p.m. UTC

Major players in the crypto industry want favorable regulations, and they’re actively explaining their own visions.

You’re reading State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter looking at the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. Click here to sign up for future editions.

Policy week

The narrative

There’s a growing push from the crypto industry to suggest how regulators can approach this rapidly-growing sector.

Why it matters

Crypto exchanges Coinbase and FTX, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) and the Digital Dollar Foundation have all recently published suggested policy proposals for addressing the digital asset market, ranging from creating a dedicated regulator for crypto to detailing how a central bank digital currency could address privacy issues.

Clearly, the industry is hoping to have a hand in creating a favorable regulatory regime in the U.S.

Breaking it down

So, these proposals could be seen in two different ways. The first is as a serious policy push that industry players hope will one day come to fruition. The other is an effort to kick-start a conversation around how crypto should be regulated.

I was in Washington, D.C., last week meeting folks both from industry and from the offices of various lawmakers and it’s really not yet clear to me what sort of traction these industry-driven proposals will gain. Ignoring for a minute the difficulties in passing a bill through both the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate, the proposals themselves would require buy-in from a broad swath of both regulators and the lawmakers overseeing them.

Much of the reception to these proposals has been that they may all be nonstarters. Lawmakers aren’t interested in letting the crypto industry define the terms of its regulatory framework for various reasons, according to some of the individuals I spoke to. On a substantive level, even crypto-friendly lawmakers seem to disagree with the premise of pouring excessive resources into developing novel tools for overseeing crypto.

Tweets and public statements lambasting regulators are also not impressing the lawmakers who might look at these proposals. They might even be counterproductive if the goal is to be taken seriously, say Washington insiders.

(Seriously, it’s kind of amazing how many different people brought up recent tweets as examples of how to not make a case for favorable crypto regulation.)

If these proposals aren’t meant to be taken literally, but rather as a spark for conversation, then they may actually be going somewhere. While the proposals themselves are varied in scope, they share some common themes: being precise in defining terms, calling for greater transparency and user privacy concerns.

We know that the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets plans to publish its stablecoin report soon, which will call for Congress to enact legislation treating stablecoin issuers like banks. One of a16z’s proposals recommended something similar, which may be helpful for lawmakers who are looking for industry input if they try to craft this kind of bill.

Clearer definitions of tokens may also help, for the crowd that sees a distinction between utility tokens and security tokens. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has so far maintained there’s no real difference in the U.S., but safe harbor proposals from Commissioner Hester Peirce and Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) would create these distinctions if enacted, from which startups and other industry advocates would benefit.

It’s clear regulations are coming. It’s also likely pushback will be involved along the way. One project may know that better than most.

Novi’s first steps

Novi, Facebook’s digital wallet subsidiary, announced a small pilot project last week in partnership with stablecoin issuer Paxos and crypto exchange Coinbase’s custody wing. Under the terms of the pilot project, which will launch in the U.S. and Guatemala, Novi customers can purchase Paxos dollars (USDP) and the company will store the funds with Coinbase Custody.

Just hours later, five U.S. Democratic senators published an open letter ordering Facebook to cease and desist, adding on an order to discontinue work on its own Diem project for good measure.

Even though only Democrats signed the letter, I’m told that a dislike of Facebook is one of the few truly bipartisan issues in Washington right now.

The bad news for Diem, and by extension projects like Novi, is that it’s also maybe inextricably linked to Facebook due to how the social media giant announced the project in 2019.

Novi, of course, is also a direct subsidiary to Facebook, which likely didn’t help it on the reputational front last week.

A lot of the current conversation around stablecoin regulation can trace its origins back to the original Libra project announcement. While the industry has changed since then, the perception of Facebook hasn’t. Recent reports about Facebook won’t help.

The thing to watch for now is whether Facebook will continue with its pilot project or proceed to a full launch of the Novi wallet or whether it will suspend these operations in light of congressional opposition.

Diem, which is a separate entity, faces a similar question. A few months ago it announced it was partnering with Silvergate Bank to launch a dollar-pegged stablecoin pending regulatory approvals. These approvals are still pending and there isn’t a clear timeline right now for when this may launch.

Biden’s rule

Changing of the guard

Key: (nom.) = nominee, (rum.) = rumored, (act.) = acting, (inc.) = incumbent (no replacement anticipated)
Key: (nom.) = nominee, (rum.) = rumored, (act.) = acting, (inc.) = incumbent (no replacement anticipated)

Acting CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam will face the Senate Agriculture Committee tomorrow in a hearing considering his nomination to serve a full term as chair.


  • For $200, You Can Trade Crypto With a Fake ID: If you want to trade on a crypto exchange, without going through your own know-your-customer process, you can pay somewhere between $150 and $200 for a verified trading account. CoinDesk’s own Anna Baydakova explores how this process works and how less scrupulous traders can access them in this excellently reported deep dive.
  • ProShares Bitcoin Futures ETF ‘BITO’ Hauls In $570M of Assets in Stock-Market Debut: ProShares had a stellar debut, to the point where it came close to breaching a mandatory limit on the number of positions it can allow.
  • Crypto 2022: Policy Week: More than a dozen of the industry’s most active voices weighed in on how crypto is being viewed by regulators in a major package of features and opinions. If you’vee subscribed to this newsletter, it’s well worth your time.

Outside CoinDesk:

  • (Vice) Hackers have breached Iranian gas station networks, Vice reports, in yet another example of digital infrastructure being as important as physical infrastructure.
  • (The Record) Ukrainian police officials have “detained suspects” on allegations of stealing from crypto wallets and money laundering.

If you’ve got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week or any other feedback you’d like to share, feel free to email me at nik@coindesk.com or find me on Twitter @nikhileshde.

You can also join the group conversation on Telegram.

See ya’ll next week!

Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.


Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. In November 2023, CoinDesk was acquired by the Bullish group, owner of Bullish, a regulated, digital assets exchange. The Bullish group is majority-owned by Block.one; both companies have interests in a variety of blockchain and digital asset businesses and significant holdings of digital assets, including bitcoin. CoinDesk operates as an independent subsidiary with an editorial committee to protect journalistic independence. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive options in the Bullish group as part of their compensation.

Nikhilesh De

Nikhilesh De is CoinDesk's managing editor for global policy and regulation. He owns marginal amounts of bitcoin and ether.