Fed Reserve Analysts Say Common Digital Currency Distinction 'Problematic'

Bitcoin blurs the boundaries of a widely used classification of digital currencies and the distinction should be retired, say Fed experts.

AccessTimeIconAug 13, 2020 at 8:25 a.m. UTC
Updated Sep 14, 2021 at 9:43 a.m. UTC
10 Years of Decentralizing the Future
May 29-31, 2024 - Austin, TexasThe biggest and most established global hub for everything crypto, blockchain and Web3.Register Now

Financial experts at the New York Federal Reserve have taken a critical look the differences between a "common" distinction made between digital currency systems.

  • In a Wednesday Fed blog post, economists Rod Garratt and Michael Lee, analyst Brendan Malone and research exec Antoine Martin outlined the characteristics of "account-based" and "token-based" digital currency systems.
  • According to the post, an account-based system requires verification of the identity of a payer, while a token-based system needs to verify if the "object" (i.e., token) used to pay is valid or not.
  • The trouble, they write, is that some cryptocurrencies possess characteristics of both.
  • In fact, the classification method is "problematic" because the systems are not mutually exclusive and can't be broken down to provide "a taxonomic hierarchy of digital payment methods."
  • The authors cite bitcoin as a prime example of a payment method possessing characteristics of both systems.
  • Due to the way cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are constructed, the account-based system for digital currencies can be applied because of the nature of private keys and the alphanumeric string of numbers and letters that make up a bitcoin address.
  • That is, their identity is verified using the private key and address.
  • Yet, when a person wants to spend her bitcoin, the protocol verifies the payment's validity by tracking its transaction history, making the crypto a fit for the token-based method.
  • The authors note the difference among bitcoin, dollar bills and gold coins is whether a recipient of a payment can ascertain the validity of the payment unit with "reasonably high confidence."
  • While dollar bills contain security features making them hard to counterfeit, a crypto user cannot "independently" ascertain if their tokens are valid, they write.
  • It's worth noting that blockchains like Bitcoin's ensure the validity of transactions with multiple confirmations from miners using powerful computing hardware, removing the need for independent verification of each unit.
  • In conclusion, the authors argue, the distinctions between the two classifications have limited value.
  • And while such classification systems can be a useful tool in organizing and communicating concepts, in this case they could impede understanding of the growing digital currency technology space.
  • "Perhaps these terms should be retired to avoid further confusion," they write.


Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. In November 2023, CoinDesk was acquired by the Bullish group, owner of Bullish, a regulated, digital assets exchange. The Bullish group is majority-owned by Block.one; both companies have interests in a variety of blockchain and digital asset businesses and significant holdings of digital assets, including bitcoin. CoinDesk operates as an independent subsidiary with an editorial committee to protect journalistic independence. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive options in the Bullish group as part of their compensation.

Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.