The guys behind Slock.it are at it again.
The original DAO raised as much as $150m worth of ether by selling tokens that would be used by stakeholders to vote on projects to fund. Yet a then-unforeseen flaw in the DAO's smart contract was exploited, resulting in a $60m loss and the collapse of the project.
Charity DAO, by contrast, is aimed at making charitable functions more transparent, and if everything works as planned, increasing the willingness of donors to give.
Jentzsch told CoinDesk:
Unlike the for-profit DAO, which was intended to pay dividends to investors based on the success of its investments, this effort is intended as a nonprofit. But to prevent even the potential of such high-stakes losses like with The DAO, Jentzsch says this time around he’ll temporarily cap the amount raised and a so-called "security hatch" will be written into the code.
“But long term, I hope this can be removed to be truly decentralized and autonomous,” he told CoinDesk.
Conducted in partnership with a group identified as "Giveth" in the blog, Charity DAO will let donors control their funds and vote on which projects they want to fund.
While this is not formally a product of Slock.it, Jentzsch says some of the same people who contributed are still involved. Jentzsch is leading the project, but wants to open it up to outside contributors.
The model itself sounds remarkably similar to The DAO, except the recipients of the funds will ostensibly also be nonprofits.
"We want to use the knowledge and the experience learned from this experience to create a Charity DAO,” wrote Jentzsch in the post. “The Charity DAO will have a very narrow focus."
A second chance?
In the aftermath of the collapse of The DAO, when an unknown perpetrator took advantage by moving $60m worth of funds into an account he or she controlled, the ethereum community suffered immensely.
Charity DAO, as a result, will likely face an intense amount of scrutiny.
In pitching the project in the blog post, Jentzsch argues that "trust in charities is at an all time low" and “charities have a public image problem," both of which might be hard to swallow for investors who were temporarily burned in the fall-out surrounding the DAO collapse.
But in spite of a call from one member of cryptocurrency academia to ostracize the Slock.it team from the community, one cannot help but remember the old startup-maxim: fail fast and fail often.
Jentzsch said his involvement with The DAO was "a humbling experience" that highlighted previously unknown factors. He added that it is, perhaps, exactly this experience that helped improve the code used in this current incarnation.
He told CoinDesk:
Image via Shutterstock
The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.
Learn more about Consensus 2023, CoinDesk’s longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.