New JPMorgan Report Weighs in on Bitcoin's Mt. Gox Problem
A new JPMorgan report draws comparisons between fiat central banks and bitcoin exchanges.
:format(jpg)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/coindesk/MNIY2354GNEJ5E4IOYLGOGMXME.jpg)
Just weeks after JPMorgan released its first report on bitcoin, the US-based multinational financial services company has weighed in on ongoing issues related to major bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox.
Authored by the company’s head of global FX strategy, John Normand, the new one-page report – available publicly to JPMorgan's clients – draws comparisons between bitcoin exchanges and traditional central banks.
Perhaps, most notably, Norman addressed the inability of Mt. Gox customers to transfer funds to third parties, writing:
He added: "From a corporate or investor perspective, an exchange control is any restriction which limits financial transfers or imposes a different exchange rate for certain transactions."
The latest report, while also critical of bitcoin, indicates interest in digital currencies remains at JPMorgan and that Normand's report is not simply a one-off project.
The Mt. Gox saga
The report did pay particular attention to the ongoing Mt. Gox "saga", ultimately concluding that recent events show virtual currencies can give rise to two-tier markets and convertibility risks.
JPMorgan spoke broadly about the challenges experienced by Bitstamp, BTC-e and Mt. Gox, and suggested that the DDoS attacks faced by the companies amounted to a "security breach", though no bitcoins or customer personal information has been compromised by the attack.
It correctly noted that two exchanges have restarted transfers, and that Mt. Gox plans to do so.
Price volatility
Norman indicated that the current data shows prices are depressed across all exchanges because of the ongoing issues with Mt. Gox, and that this has lead to below-average trading volumes. Furthermore, he added that prices are likely down due to the belief Mt. Gox bitcoins will be later sold on other exchanges, potentially impacting the market.
The author credited this decline as "reflecting some discomfort with broader market architecture", a claim that is given credence by the many reddit threads devoted to speculating on the company's future as well as the future of the bitcoins still in its exchange.
Such speculation was likely heightened by CEO Mark Karpeles' decision to step down from the Bitcoin Foundation board.
An optimistic conclusion?
Though Normand suggests his opinion differs, he did indicate it was possible to view the events at Mt. Gox in a positive light for bitcoin, saying:
Still, Normand suggested that he believes the events are proof virtual currencies will require intermediaries, and therefore not be able to deliver the sweeping cost savings they currently provide in the absence of such financial networks in the future.
"From that perspective, it will be difficult to ensure than virtual currencies deliver frictionless exchange as they evolve over time," he concluded.
Image credit: Chase Tower | Joe Mabel
DISCLOSURE
Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.
The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.
Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk’s longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.