Recent auctions of non-fungible tokens (NFT) at the Christie’s and Sotheby’s auction houses might give the impression the fine art world has embraced the new crypto-art trend with open arms. But that would be a mistake. According to one of the art world’s biggest players, the auction houses aren’t leading tastemakers and NFTs still have very little foothold in the broader fine art industry.
“The early signals we see in the art world are around what galleries, collectors and curators do,” says Scott Lynn, CEO of art investing service Masterworks, which fractionalizes blue-chip (physical) art to make the investment more accessible. “So far, it’s been pretty limited [for NFTs]. The Beeple sale [for $69.3 million], the people registered for that [auction] were crypto people, not art people. The Venn Diagram is pretty separate.”
As frenzied as activity around NFTs has been in recent months, that distance from fine art might be concerning to NFT investors, creators and platforms. Blue-chip fine art has been one of the strongest investment categories of recent decades, returning an average of 14% per year since 1995. But so far there’s no solid reason to assume NFTs will benefit from the same social and market forces that keep fine art prices moving steadily upwards.
NFTs are riding a hype train right now, but the market for high-end NFTs in particular is only beginning to spread beyond crypto insiders. The number of people who can or will pay multimillion-dollar price tags for digital collectibles is finite, and at the moment fine art is a major rival for their dollars. In 2018, art was the top unconventional investment for high-net-worth individuals, edging out wine, diamonds and stamps. Gaining a foothold in the fine art industry, then, could make the market momentum of NFTs more sustainable.
“We view [NFTs] more as an extension of crypto than we do as enthusiasm for art,” says Lynn. He should know – he says he’s been an art collector since the 1990s and his collection is now one of the largest in the world. Masterworks itself, acting on behalf of its clients, is now the largest buyer in the art market, according to the company.
Fine art is indeed an industry – and a big one. Fine art sales generate about $60 billion in transaction volume a year. According to Deloitte, the total value of blue-chip fine art – the asset’s market cap, if you will – is $1.7 trillion. For scale, that’s not far short of the current $2.3 trillion total market cap of all cryptocurrencies.
Returns on fine art investments have also been huge. Blue-chip art – paintings by big, recognizable, often dead names like Van Gogh – beat the S&P 500 by 180% from 2000-2018, according to Artprice. Those might be modest annual returns by NFT standards, but as any half-decent investor will tell you, it’s the long run that usually counts. Without that kind of track record, NFTs are still highly speculative from a finance and investing perspective.
NFT valuations would be reinforced by better integration with the complex taste-making apparatus of the fine art world. The art industry’s big numbers are supported by a humming and many-layered web of commercial galleries, nonprofit museums, curators, critics, dealers, art handlers and hopeful interns. And just as adoption and hype in the blockchain world is largely a matter of what people are talking about on Twitter and Telegram, the value of art pieces is set in large part by the constant conversation and debate within that world.
That conversation is especially important because art, and the quality thereof, is so subjective, according to a 2018 statistical study of art valuation.
“Art appeals to individual senses, pleasures, feelings and emotions,” wrote the research team, led by Samuel Fraiberger, a former Harvard researcher now at the World Bank. “Recognition depends on variables external to the work itself, like its attribution, the artist’s body of work, the display venue and the work’s relationship to art history as a whole. Recognition and value are shaped by a network of experts, curators, collectors and art historians whose judgments act as gatekeepers for museums, galleries, and auction houses.”
The study assembled a dataset of art pieces and followed their prices over long time spans. The conclusion, broadly, was that an artist’s association with high-profile institutions, particularly galleries, had a huge impact on the long-term value of an artist’s work.
“The lasting success of an artist depends on where she gets exhibited,” says Marcus Resch, one of the study’s co-authors. “Translated to the NFT world this means that only NFT art that gets exhibited in a few selected galleries/museums will enjoy lasting value.”
Of course, that doesn’t mean the same Paris and New York galleries and museums that dominate the mainstream fine art world will become gatekeepers for NFTs – in fact, they’ve shown little interest so far. A few New York galleries have held NFT shows, but they’ve largely been upstart players like Superchief, a gallery that has a strong “cool factor” but is well outside the orbit of star-making powerhouse galleries like Gagosian, David Zwirner, Anton Kern or White Cube.
Whether or not the established art world or physical galleries are involved, the subjective nature of art and culture suggests that some similar ecosystem of culture-industry tastemakers and gatekeepers will almost inevitably come to influence what NFTs are more highly valued than others. That influence will grow slowly, just as today’s fine-art powerhouses grew. But over time, it would help NFTs lock in the kind of long-run growth that mainstream fine art has shown.
“How does what we define as cultural significance impact the investment profile of an object?” Lynn asks. “What we see is that cultural significance is important to how an object increases or decreases in value.”
Lynn thinks this is a possible future for NFTs, even if it hasn’t happened yet. He has some concerns about the intellectual property and legal dimensions of NFTs as investments, but he allows they have potential as fine art. He particularly cites NFTs that leverage the truly unique technological features of the medium, such as interactivity or automation.
Others in the fine art establishment are definitely curious about the medium. Damien Hirst is probably the most famous artist to dabble in NFTs, with his series “The Currency.” It’s notable, though, that Hirst has spent his career flirting with mockery of art’s commercialization, so the series isn’t necessarily meant as a vigorous endorsement of the technology. New York Magazine art critic Jerry Saltz also seems pro-NFT, writing recently that “someday, there may be a Francis Bacon of NFTs,” referring to one of the greatest (and most valuable) contemporary painters. Saltz is arguably the most prominent working art critic (though perhaps not the most nuanced), and even sold his own NFT for charity.
But Saltz has also referred to Beeple, one of the most prominent NFT artists, as “just really really derivative Sci-Fi and Conan and Star Wars crapola as far as imagery and imagination go. Whatever the medium, they’re just bad kitsch.”
Most NFT artists are working in a similar popular vein, and have little to add to the artistic conversation taking place in critical venues and important tastemaking institutions (all of which, remember, are key to investment returns). If an NFT-focused artist started trying to penetrate the fine art world today, it would take that person years, if not decades, to build a career: Fine art offers huge rewards, but only at the end of a relentless and nebulous hustle. Crucially, this is not an industry that has made much progress in going online, and a serious art career still more or less requires living in a handful of art capitals.
But even if established artists truly embrace them and NFTs become a viable medium for younger artists, Lynn thinks NFTs still have to pay some dues as an investment before they can compete for the same buyers as blue-chip fine art. “A strategic asset class beats inflation and lacks correlation to other assets,” says Lynn. “I just don’t see any way that NFTs, with their volatility and short track record, fit that. It doesn’t feel like an investment to me.”
The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.
Learn more about Consensus 2023, CoinDesk’s longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.