FTX Violated Its Own Terms of Service and Misused User Funds, Lawyers Say

Although the crypto exchange's terms of service prevented it from using customer assets, lawyers suggest FTX's swift downfall indicates the funds were misused.

AccessTimeIconNov 10, 2022 at 5:17 p.m. UTC
Updated Nov 11, 2022 at 7:54 a.m. UTC
Drive the Crypto Policy Conversation Forward
October 24, 2023 • Convene • Washington D.C.Where the industry establishes the digital economy’s legal, regulatory and compliance best practices for the future.Register Now

Sam Bankman-Fried’s embattled cryptocurrency exchange FTX may have misused customer funds in violation of its own terms of service, lawyers have told CoinDesk.

FTX’s downward spiral, which began after a CoinDesk article last week about its sister company Alameda Research’s financials, prompted the exchange to halt customer withdrawals on Tuesday, indicating it did not have the required funds to cover all the crypto locked on its platform.

But the exchange’s terms of service states that none of the crypto in customer accounts are “the property of, or shall or may be loaned to, FTX Trading,” and that the platform “does not represent or treat Digital Assets in User’s Accounts as belonging to FTX Trading.” In other words, FTX cannot use the funds for purposes other than just holding them on customers’ behalf.

Citing people close to the matter, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that FTX had placed billions of dollars worth of customer funds on risky bets, with some suspecting customer funds were used to help bolster Alameda.

“Using customers’ investments to support Alameda Research is a serious problem and could amount to claims for fraudulent breach of trust,” said Louise Abbott, a disputes solicitor in the U.K. who deals with cryptocurrency and asset recovery at Keystone Law.

Speaking with CoinDesk, three other lawyers are in agreement with Abbott, saying FTX’s actions appear to point to a misappropriation of customer investments.

“If you were an FTX customer, you should have felt very safe because they were telling you that they weren't going to do anything with your belongings,” said Matthew Nyman of the digital assets and Web3 practice at the law firm CMS. “And if it turns out that they breached their word, using those funds to lend to Alameda or anyone else, then that's even worse, because they held themselves to a higher standard.”

Twitter user @wassielawyer, who was one of the first to flag the Terms of Service, went even further, saying, “FTX was literally stealing customer funds.”

Although FTX’s quick collapse following the CoinDesk article and a Twitter-spat between Bankman-Fried and rival Changpeng Zhao of Binance suggests the exchange had misused user funds, Nyman says it may not constitute actual theft. He added that it is a technical difference and a serious wrong either way.

The provision made in the terms of service stipulating that customers retained title to their assets will be particularly important if the company ends up facing insolvency, Nyman said. With Binance backing out of a buyout and Alameda winding down services, FTX could file for bankruptcy in Antigua and Barbuda, where it was incorporated.

But there might be a silver lining, Nyman said. Because the terms of service specify that customer funds do not belong to FTX, those funds cannot be used to pay back creditors or other stakeholders in the event of insolvency. The lines may blur, however, for those customers who opted into a yield-earning program, because those funds were not subject to the same retention of title provisions and can therefore get caught up as assets in a bankruptcy case.

Beyond any civil actions taken by FTX users who cannot access their funds, misappropriation of customer funds could lead to criminal charges. The U.S. Department of Justice is already investigating FTX, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

FTX’s Japan unit was ordered by regulators to suspend all operations after it halted withdrawals without specifying a date for reinstatement and without stopping the onboarding of new customers.

"It is necessary to take all possible measures to prevent a situation in which [Japanese customers' assets] are leaked to a [foreign] affiliated company," Japan’s Financial Services Agency said in its suspension order.

Camomile Shumba contributed reporting.

Update (07:54 UTC, Nov. 11, 2022): Updates Matthew Nyman's title in seventh paragraph and adds additional comments throughout.


Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.

Sandali Handagama

Sandali Handagama is CoinDesk's deputy managing editor for policy and regulations, EMEA. She does not own any crypto.

Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk’s longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.