Bitcoin, Stablecoins the Worst Options for Cross-Border Payments, ECB Study Says

A senior central banker said state-backed digital currencies would be quicker and cheaper.

AccessTimeIconAug 2, 2022 at 12:41 p.m. UTC
Updated Aug 2, 2022 at 2:33 p.m. UTC

Jack Schickler is a CoinDesk reporter focused on crypto regulations, based in Brussels, Belgium. He doesn’t own any crypto.

Bitcoin and stablecoins are the worst of all options for cutting the cost and time associated with cross-border payments, a study published by the European Central Bank Monday said.

Spurred by private-sector initiatives like the now defunct Facebook-backed Libra, regulators are looking at how to tighten up the clunky payments networks that can leave people waiting days for their money, but central banks would rather be in the driving seat themselves.

“The holy grail of cross-border payments is a solution allowing cross-border payments to be immediate, cheap, universal and settled in a secure settlement medium,” said the study, which was co-authored by Ulrich Bindseil, the ECB's director-general for market infrastructure and payments.

“Bitcoin is least credible” of the visions to achieve that, the report continued, and stablecoins – crypto assets that seek to tie their value to other assets such as fiat currencies – come in a close second given concerns over their market power.

The report says a bitcoin-based system wouldn’t work because of its “inherently inefficient” proof-of-work consensus mechanism, the “widespread” use for criminal purposes and the volatility of the asset. It also described the fervor of the cryptocurrency’s supporters as “quasi-religious.”

There’s more mileage in linking together individual jurisdictions’ central bank-issued digital currencies (CBDCs), Bindseil wrote. although few CBDCs exist yet.

Those developing CBDCs – presumably including the ECB, which is considering a digital euro – should “discuss at a relatively early stage the related interoperability issues” to ensure they can work together with other currency zones, the study said.

They should also try to make existing domestic instant-payment systems operate with each other, despite questions over how to vet dirty money, and deal with counterparties who might default, it added.

Fabio Panetta, a member of the ECB’s executive board, has previously called crypto a “Ponzi scheme" that regulators should be "less tolerant" toward. The Bank for International Settlements, an association of major central banks, which previously revealed that nine in 10 central banks are working on a CBDC, in July called for greater cooperation among the banks.

DISCLOSURE

Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.

CoinDesk - Unknown

Jack Schickler is a CoinDesk reporter focused on crypto regulations, based in Brussels, Belgium. He doesn’t own any crypto.

CoinDesk - Unknown

Jack Schickler is a CoinDesk reporter focused on crypto regulations, based in Brussels, Belgium. He doesn’t own any crypto.