Tackling Ethereum Problems at ETHDenver

Developers gathered in Denver to discuss all things Ethereum: staking, DAOs and decentralized finance (DeFi).

AccessTimeIconFeb 23, 2022 at 12:30 p.m. UTC
Updated Apr 10, 2024 at 2:12 a.m. UTC
Layer 2

Attending ETHDenver this past weekend allowed me to gain insight into the frontline of DeFi, NFTs, DAOs and all the exciting parts of Ethereum that the industry loves. And it was also amazing to get a chance to see how developers were tackling problems at the core infrastructure level of Ethereum and its transition to proof-of-stake.

This article originally appeared in Valid Points, CoinDesk’s weekly newsletter breaking down Ethereum 2.0 and its sweeping impact on crypto markets. Subscribe to Valid Points here.

Running an Ethereum validator

Running an Ethereum validator is not a household activity for most. The upfront cost of 32 ETH is now about $85,000, and it peaked at over $150,000 at the top of last year’s cycle. Furthermore, validators have to lock their ether for an unknown amount of time, adding further uncertainty to a rather large investment. This is not to say that nobody is interested in staking ether, as there are almost 300,000 active validators locking 8% of the ether supply.

In order to further the efforts in decentralization and security, Carl Beekhuizen, a member of the Ethereum Foundation’s research and development team, hosted a chat at ETHDenver to talk about the current landscape of Ethereum staking.

A significant chunk of validators are run by staking services that are hosted by crypto exchanges Coinbase and Kraken and by staking service provider Lido. While it's a rough estimate, 29.7% of validators were controlled or outsourced by Kraken and Lido alone. That statistic may not be overly concerning at the moment, but it would be largely positive for individual stakers to grow in size and take a larger market share. The shift to individual staking would benefit Ethereum by strengthening the network against regulatory pressures, improving client diversity and ensuring no large actors can collude to attack the network.

It’s tough to blame those using a staking service or even staking services themselves. Users get most of the incentives of staking (ETH rewards and securing the network) without the upfront expense of 32 ether. Meanwhile, staking services provide the technical knowledge needed for active validator management, and sometimes they even provide liquid staking through tokenized deposits. So how does the network encourage staking on the individual front?

What’s new? “Staking with friends”

Continued innovation around the Ethereum ecosystem has improved the staking experience, minimizing the drawbacks of self-staking without sacrificing decentralization. This is a different approach than the built-in disincentives that try to make outsized, large-scale staking not worth the underlying risk.

Beekhuizen took the stage this past weekend to dive into distributed validators and the potential for solutions like Secret Shared Validator Network and Obol. Distributed pools can break a validation key across several participants, and so each member in a group of four, for example, could hold a piece of the key that is useless without the rest of the group. Using this model, the group can create parameters for how many of the four stakeholders it would take to agree on attestations and block proposals, all while running the validator locally on different client software.

Running a distributed validator with multiple clients hedges against downtime and client bug risk, making the experience not only more accessible but also safer. The combination of harsher punishment for large staking providers and increasing accessibility for individual stakers could reverse current validation trends, but the user experience must continue to improve until Ethereum staking makes sense for everyone in the ecosystem.

Pulse check

The following is an overview of network activity on the Ethereum Beacon Chain over the past week. For more information about the metrics featured in this section, check out our 101 explainer on Eth 2.0 metrics.

Beaconcha.in, Etherscan
Beaconcha.in, Etherscan
Beaconcha.in, Beaconscan
Beaconcha.in, Beaconscan

Disclaimer: All profits made from CoinDesk’s Eth 2.0 staking venture will be donated to a charity of the company’s choosing once transfers are enabled on the network.

Validated takes

  • Seventeen OpenSea users were affected by a mass phishing email that drained wallets of the ERC-721 tokens representing their NFTs. BACKGROUND: Several owners of non-fungible tokens received a fake OpenSea email encouraging them to migrate their tokens to the V2 contract, which, when approved, gave the attacker an opportunity to buy the NFTs for free. The issue had no link to OpenSea’s real contracts and thus appears to be more of a custody hack than an exploit.
  • Frax Finance is launching a decentralized CPI-tracking stablecoin to create an inflation resistant asset. BACKGROUND: Frax is known for its first dollar-pegged stablecoin, which now has over $2.6 billion in circulation. The “Frax Price Index” will track a basket of assets, which can later be voted on by governance token holders for inclusion and weighting.
  • The ETHDenver Hackathon was host to exciting ideas across DeFi, DAOs, NFTs and zero-knowledge technology. BACKGROUND: Large hackathons historically generate a lot of attention from venture firms and play host to innovation throughout the crypto industry. This year’s decentralized finance (DeFi) and NFT finalists focused on Maximum Extractable Value avoidance, low fee “dust” swaps and capital efficiency within NFT trading via borrowing and derivatives.
  • A former Bored Ape Yacht Club owner is suing OpenSea for the accidental sale of his NFT. BACKGROUND: A bug allowed attackers to purchase NFTs using outdated listings that were not live on the marketplace, forcing users to sell NFTs for less than market value. While the lawsuit contains a few errors, lawyers familiar with the technology believe a negligence suit may be possible.

Factoid of the week

Factoid of the Week
Factoid of the Week

Open comms

Valid Points incorporates information and data about CoinDesk’s own Eth 2.0 validator in weekly analysis. All profits made from this staking venture will be donated to a charity of our choosing once transfers are enabled on the network. For a full overview of the project, check out our announcement post.

You can verify the activity of the CoinDesk Eth 2.0 validator in real time through our public validator key, which is:


Search for it on any Eth 2.0 block explorer site.


Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. In November 2023, CoinDesk was acquired by the Bullish group, owner of Bullish, a regulated, digital assets exchange. The Bullish group is majority-owned by Block.one; both companies have interests in a variety of blockchain and digital asset businesses and significant holdings of digital assets, including bitcoin. CoinDesk operates as an independent subsidiary with an editorial committee to protect journalistic independence. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive options in the Bullish group as part of their compensation.

Edward Oosterbaan

Edward was an analyst on the CoinDesk Research team focusing on Ethereum and DeFi. He holds ETH, AVAX, OHM and a small amount of other cryptocurrencies.