For Ether Investors, All Eyes Remain on Divisive Fork Debate

The price of ether remains volatile following the loss of investor funds by one of the blockchain platform's signature projects.

AccessTimeIconJun 29, 2016 at 8:56 p.m. UTC
Updated Sep 11, 2021 at 12:21 p.m. UTC
Consensus 2023 Logo
Join the most important conversation in crypto and Web3 taking place in Austin, Texas, April 26-28.
Consensus 2023 Logo
Join the most important conversation in crypto and Web3 taking place in Austin, Texas, April 26-28.
CoinDesk - Unknown

Screen Shot 2016-06-29 at 4.32.59 PM

The price of ether, the native currency that powers the blockchain platform ethereum, sank yesterday following an Ethereum Foundation blog post that pointed out a flaw in a proposed plan meant to rescue funds lost in an attack on one of its signature projects, The DAO.

The flaw would leave the distributed organization open to a denial of service (DOS) attack, and fears of such an event have driven ether prices lower, according to traders.

Ether prices fell to as little as $11.60 during yesterday's session, down roughly 17% from their opening price of $13.95, Poloniex figures reveal. The digital currency later recovered, opening at $12.18 on 29th June and rising to a press time total of $12.69.

Still, the event showcases the sensitivity in the market to the current situation, which could find ethereum developers taking divisive steps to return funds to investors.

Members of the ethereum development community have been scrambling to find a solution to the hack that resulted in the theft of 3.6m ether tokens since it occurred almost two weeks ago. One potential solution that has generated visibility is a soft fork that would attempt to blacklist the address holding the confiscated funds, though it now appears unlikely as miners have largely stopped voting for the proposal.

At this point, it looks uncertain "whether they'll even be able to put together a sufficiently safe soft fork in the limited weeks they have," algorithmic trader Jacob Eliosoff told CoinDesk. As a result, many are leaning toward either implementing a hard fork solution or simply letting the hacker keep the funds, he added.

Sources point to the event as contributing to "uncertainty" in ethereum's market, which could continue for weeks.

Due to provisions in The DAO's coding, the attacker is currently prohibited from spending the confiscated funds, a safety mechanism that remains in place, but only until 14th July.

Charles L. Bovaird II is a financial writer and consultant with strong knowledge of securities markets and investing concepts.

Follow Charles Bovaird on Twitter here.

Abacus image via Shutterstock


Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.

Learn more about Consensus 2023, CoinDesk’s longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to to register and buy your pass now.