IMF Economist Examines Bitcoin Blockchain's Role in Banking

The IMF has published an article that looks at the pros and cons of bitcoin's blockchain technology in the banking and trading sectors.

AccessTimeIconJun 15, 2016 at 4:06 p.m. UTC
Updated Sep 11, 2021 at 12:19 p.m. UTC
Consensus 2023 Logo
Join the most important conversation in crypto and Web3 taking place in Austin, Texas, April 26-28.
Consensus 2023 Logo
Join the most important conversation in crypto and Web3 taking place in Austin, Texas, April 26-28.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has published an article in Finance and Development magazine that examines the case for bitcoin's blockchain technology and suggests that while the technology might have been built to "avoid banks" it could have benefits for the banking and trading sectors.

Authored by Andreas Adriano, a senior communications officer in the IMF’s communications department, and Hunter Monroe, a senior economist in the IMF’s monetary and capital markets department, the piece, titled "The Internet of Trust" provides an overview of bitcoin's history, its underlying blockchain technology and the potential uses of both.

Unsurprisingly, the article leans towards the financial sector and ponders whether blockchain tech could make payments and trade settlements cheaper and simpler.

Warning that some people view bitcoin as a Ponzi scheme, the authors say: "Bitcoin – or more precisely, the underlying technology that allows it to function, called distributed ledgers, or blockchain – could allow what many see as radical rewiring of the financial sector."

More intended as a primer to the technology than any form of guidance, the piece avoids making any strong commitments for or against, but it does at least provide an open-minded presentation of the facts; clearly explaining why bitcoin is viewed as a tech revolution and quoting the likes of Marc Andreessen on its potential impact.

The European Central Bank's director general of market infrastructure and payments, Marc Bayle, is quoted to temper the piece's tone.

Asked whether the blockchain can really live up to its promise and speed up the world of finance, he says: "There’s nothing in the current technologies preventing instant settlement. The problem is the structure of markets."

In conclusion, the article is neutral, saying: "It is probably too early to say whether blockchain is 'the next Internet' or just an incremental evolution", but it ends on a positive note with:

"The blockchain game is only beginning."

DISCLOSURE

Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.


Learn more about Consensus 2023, CoinDesk’s longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.



Read more about