The US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued new rulings indicating that digital currency-related cloud mining and escrow services should not be considered money transmitters.
The two releases came via what appear to be responses to requests from businesses seeking to better understand FinCEN’s policies.
FinCEN, the bureau of the US treasury that collects and analyzes financial transactions, has previously released influential decisions regarding how consumer bitcoin miners and bitcoin investors should be regulated under money transmission laws.
Published letter rulings often express an opinion about a new issue, according to the agency’s website.
Escrow in digital currency transactions is used to ensure parties are able to pay each other while remaining relatively unknown.
Read one letter that FinCEN released today:
“The [escrow company] needs to take possession of the funds and hold them in escrow until the pre-established conditions for the funds to be paid to the seller or returned to the buyer are met, then release those funds appropriately.”
The letter also presented background information on more traditional escrow-related businesses that FinCEN has ruled should not be treated as money transmitters.
This included instances of escrow companies that have, “accepted any consumer and any merchant willing to use its confidential process, and played no active part in arranging, monitoring, verifying or endorsing the transactions that it processed”.
FinCEN reasoned in the letter that this process, while part of a transactional as a whole, is not in itself a money transmission-type of service:
“The acceptance and transmission of funds do not constitute a separate and discrete service provided in addition to the underlying service of transaction management.”
Cloud mining is when a customer ‘rents’ digital currency mining hardware from a provider. Customers then pay the provider on a monthly or yearly contract and profit from a subsequent portion of a confirmed blocks.
The second FinCEN letter states that this type of business does not fall under the auspices of Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) regulations:
“Renting of mining computer systems to third parties does not make the Company a money transmitter under BSA regulations.”
The letter notes that FinCEN’s view is that as property, digital currency that is mined under this system does not change hands:
“All virtual currency mined by the third party remains the third party’s property, and the Company has no access to the third party wallet, nor receives or pays virtual currency on the third party’s behalf.”
It seems that the computer systems component is central to this decision. “The rental of computer systems to third parties is not an activity covered by FinCEN regulations,” the letter adds.
US Treasury building via Shutterstock