Time’s NFT Launch Sends Gas Fees Spiraling

Time’s NFT Launch Sends Gas Fees Spiraling

Time’s NFT Launch Sends Gas Fees Spiraling

Keith Grossman, the magazine’s president, admits the rollout was “not ideal.”

Keith Grossman, the magazine’s president, admits the rollout was “not ideal.”

Keith Grossman, the magazine’s president, admits the rollout was “not ideal.”

AccessTimeIconSep 23, 2021 at 9:21 p.m. UTC
Updated Sep 24, 2021 at 7:24 p.m. UTC

Yesterday afternoon, Time magazine announced a new collection of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) offering “unlimited access” to its website through 2023. Dubbed “TIMEPieces,” the collection consists of 4,676 tokens tied to digital artworks, each priced at 0.1 ETH, or around $310.

When the sale opened to the public earlier today, all 4,676 were gone in minutes.

But the sale also clogged the Ethereum blockchain, sending fees to astronomical highs – buyers spent almost four times as much on transaction fees as they did on the NFTs themselves, according to a data tracker from an analyst called Banterlytics. One address paid $70,000 for 10 of Time’s NFTs.

The plan for the launch was simple enough – the NFTs would go on sale at a set time and prospective buyers would need to have their finger on the trigger.

Even outside of crypto, this is a broken system. High-profile sales for concert tickets and sneaker releases are already dominated by automated “bots” that can snap up an entire supply in seconds. The high rollers behind the bots can take advantage by charging unreasonable prices for assets on the secondary market (it’s also known as scalping).

That’s what happened here, too. According to the blockchain explorer Etherscan, the 100 addresses with the most NFTs now own about 24% of the total supply.

The Ethereum blockchain compounds the problem with something called a “priority fee.” These are additional fees users can pay to incentivize miners to accept their transactions first, before other users who haven’t put up as much cash. When too many people try to use the network at once, it creates a bottleneck; users who can afford to pay those exorbitant fees can effectively cut the line.

A caveat is that because the NFTs in Time’s collection all just point to a red Time logo, rather than a digital artwork, buyers still don’t know what they’ve actually bought. Time President Keith Grossman said the individual works attached to the NFTs would be revealed today at 6 p.m. Eastern. Users will have to use the “refresh metadata” button on the digital marketplace OpenSea to find out what they own.

Grossman has become increasingly embedded in crypto over the past year; Time began accepting crypto payments for subscriptions this past spring, and released a set of digital magazine covers as NFTs. Time also has bitcoin on its balance sheet, thanks to a deal with the crypto investment firm Grayscale, which is owned by Digital Currency Group, CoinDesk’s parent company.

Grossman told CoinDesk that today’s high fees and inequitable distribution of NFTs were “not ideal.”

“I think we learned a lot about gas in general,” he said. “There are things that you can’t control for in the gas space.”

Grossman explained that his decision to cap the number of NFTs per address (each buyer could mint only 10, though a single buyer could mint from multiple wallets) was part of an effort to deter bots.

At publication time, the lowest listed price for a TIMEPiece was hovering at around 3 ETH, or about $9,500.

Grossman maintained that he was proud of today’s launch, in spite of the chaos.

“We’re going to make sure that the next time that we do this, everything that we have seen that went wrong or that didn’t go as we planned, is fixed,” he said.


Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.

Will Gottsegen was CoinDesk's media and culture reporter.