ECLAC: Central Bank Digital Currencies Could Empower Dictators

A central bank-issued cryptocurrency could be dangerous in the hands of a dictator, according to a recent UN report.

AccessTimeIconMay 3, 2017 at 1:46 p.m. UTC
Updated Sep 11, 2021 at 1:17 p.m. UTC
10 Years of Decentralizing the Future
May 29-31, 2024 - Austin, TexasThe biggest and most established global hub for everything crypto, blockchain and Web3.Register Now

A central bank-issued cryptocurrency could be dangerous in the hands of a dictator, according to a recent UN report.

The UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) published a new report on 1st May which explores how blockchain-based systems could help improve conditions in the region’s financial system. While outlining how the tech could boost transparency and cut the cost associated with international funds transfers, the organization did include some caveats, particularly political ones.

The paper explores the concept of a central-bank issued digital currency (CBDC)– that is, one in which a central bank uses some implementation of blockchain to underlie the issuance of an electronic money distinct from the kinds they maintain today. It's an area of research being conducted by a range of central banks, including those in China, Canada and the UK, to name a few.

Yet such a project – in which an institution would have the ability to see any and all transactions within the network, ostensibly with information about who is making those payments – poses risks should a more repressive regime take control and have access to those resources.

In particular, this broad control and oversight could empower a dictator to target the financial resources of their political opponents.

The report notes:

"A CBDC would have the potential to be a very potent tool for social repression in the event that a dictator was to come to power. Under CBDC system, this hypothetical dictator would have the ability to deny participation in the financial system to political dissidents, and would also have access to a very complete picture of all entities having financial relationships with those dissidents."

The report goes on to argue that this approach would be "ill-advised" in certain regions that lack "a very strong tradition of adherence to the rule of law". But the authors go on to note that the risk would be lower if that digital currency’s area of usage extended beyond the borders of a single country.

The full report can be found below:

Disclosure

Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.

CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. In November 2023, CoinDesk was acquired by the Bullish group, owner of Bullish, a regulated, digital assets exchange. The Bullish group is majority-owned by Block.one; both companies have interests in a variety of blockchain and digital asset businesses and significant holdings of digital assets, including bitcoin. CoinDesk operates as an independent subsidiary with an editorial committee to protect journalistic independence. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive options in the Bullish group as part of their compensation.


Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.