Features  •  Opinion

Bitcoin in a Suit: Why the Tech's Big Battle is Already Won

| Published on November 29, 2015 at 12:50 BST

John Biggs is a New York-based writer. After spending years as a programmer, Biggs decided to become a full-time journalist. His work has appeared in publications such as the New York Times, Gizmodo and Men's Health. Biggs is currently an editor for TechCrunch and the CEO of bitcoin stealth startup Freemit.

In this piece he details why he thinks bitcoin will eventually succeed.

bitcoin in a suit

A week ago I was in Belgrade watching a panel on "blockchain."

The makeup of the panel was typical: a young, plugged-in VC, an older banker guy and a crypto-anarchistic dude in a T-shirt. It was like watching a movie called "Bitcoin is Good And Bad" for the 50th time. I knew what was happening but I couldn't look away.

The panel started normally - VC guy said he liked the blockchain specifically but was iffy about those bitcoins, the older gentleman said bitcoin was bad, but then the anarchist dude was quiet. He let the banker talk. The banker said that bitcoin was untraceable. It was a fad. The crypto guy let him talk. bitcoin was a tulip bulb, said the old dude. It would never work, he clamored.

And the anarchist stayed quiet. Then the old dude was done.

The anarchist calmly explained what the future of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies held. He made cogent points that he had practiced many times. While the banker chortled at his own jokes, the VC talked about the blockchain and the audience grunted.

The anarchist won the discussion through reasoned argument.

'Bitcoin in a suit'

This is the face of bitcoin discourse in late 2015. It's a calm discussion where the craziest people in the room are the ones who are against bitcoin. We've won.

I asked the anarchist, Aaron Koenig, what he was thinking on stage. He said:

"I've been through this many times."

He was used to that line of questioning. He knew how to handle it and how to ignore it. In fact, it's the folks who don't understand cryptocurrency and the folks who don't understand bitcoin that seem the craziest these days. It's a fascinating flip.

We're basically seeing the dawn of bitcoin in a suit.

Just as Red Hat turned Linux into something an IT department could use to replace Microsoft, the new bitcoin users are turning crypto into something that a person can use to replace a bank.

The accretions of a dozen decades of banking tradition have convinced those inside the big institutions that their way is right and will be right forever. Those outside, the scrabbling sea monsters trying to figure out a new way to walk on land, know that isn't true.

There's an old quote I love, written by Wilhelm Stekel but made famous by Holden Caulfield in Catcher In The Rye.

"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause," Stekel said. "While the mark of the mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one."

The true bitcoin believer needs to take this to heart. We've already won. We've moved past the era of raving lunatics howling in the wilderness about digital gold and the end of governments.

We're in a position to make real, meaningful change in the world and to do that we need to listen more than we speak.

Malaise among investors

In my time as a bitcoin entrepreneur, I've seen a certain deep malaise rising in the investor class.

They've met too many wide-eyed Jeremiahs fresh from the desert with a plan to put our DNA on the blockchain.

They've seen investments crash quicker than HSBC after another scandal. They've been burned by guys who write banking code in PHP and host it on public servers. Now they're doing technical diligence and they're offering objections to every claim.

But there's one thing to remember in every investment scenario: objections are a buying signal. Say what you want about short-sighted folks stuck in the past: investors know that something is brewing.

In 1995, you'd have been hard-pressed to convince anyone that email was anything cooler than a way for scientists to tell each other where to point a giant telescope in Peru.

Then came Hotmail and the utility of email became obvious. The same happens with any previously complex technology: the objections die when the technology becomes part of the white noise of commerce, communication or reproduction.

Embedded in banks

So let them howl. Let hem hoot. Let them say you're doing something wrong. None of their objections are real.

They're simply trying to raise your hackles, to get you to react, to get you to fight. But the fight is over. Bitcoin is nearly embedded in every bank (they call it "blockchain research" in the banks but it's really two bitcoin people sitting in cubicles sending each other news articles from CoinDesk) and there are investors who are ready to invest in actual product.

That's right: pie in the sky ideas aren't going to cut it. You have to build. But when you build, they will come.

As we move forward we're all going to find new problems to solve and new business to build. It's inevitable. Eighteen years ago I remember sitting in an airplane listening to a guy who needed millions of dollars for Sun Servers to launch a website for a movie theatre.

Now, thanks to Linux and a bunch of work on the front end, that movie theatre can use Squarespace. It will get easier to use the Internet of Money just as it got easier to use the Internet itself.

It takes time and it takes quiet concentration. And, eventually, the people we remember as being so vocal about the dismal future of bitcoin will be the ones who use it the most.

Suit image via Shutterstock

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, CoinDesk.


Load Comments